Feminist Crybabies – Men are Mean!


It is a truism I know to say that feminists are crazy, irrational, fact adverse, and without a doubt the most bald-faced liars on the planet.

It is also a truism to say that if a “study”  – and in the context of feminist studies I use that term extremely loosely (sitting around on cushions, swigging Lidl wine in a cat urine soaked bedsit talking shoite qualifies as a “study” in the black-hole that is the feminist psyche) flat out contradicts the feminist “perspective” then…….well ignore it and state THE EXACT OPPOSITE of what the study finds – just like here:

In an article published on the 3 August 2018 entitled; Violence against women online is a direct challenge to pluralism and democracy by Jennifer Adams and Sinead Carolan, Office of the OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media

And subtitled – “We can’t achieve freedom of expression without first addressing the toxic environment many women face on the internet”.

Link here https://www.kcl.ac.uk/news/news-Article.aspx?id=5623027c-d0bb-40de-a4d5-3eddebe936f6

This statement was made about halfway down the article and a link was provided to a supporting “study” – there is a link to “2014 study” referenced in this toxic little paragraph.

“The non-profit group Working to Halt Online Abuse found that from 2000 to 2013, 70% of the 4,043 people who reported cyber harassment were female, while 25% were male and 5% were unknown.  British think tank Demos found in a 2014 study that on Twitter female journalists and TV presenters received roughly three times as much abuse as their male counterparts

Online threats can and do lead female journalists to leave the profession. They can also lead female journalists to remove themselves from social media to avoid trauma, or stay quiet about their experience with sexual harassment online for fear of repercussions for their career. This is having a devastating impact on freedom of expression.”

What made me laugh out loud – seriously – feminists say the funniest things – was the title of the “study” referenced to support these dimwits contention that…………..boo hoo, men are mean to women on the internet.

This is the title of the study:

Demos: Male celebrities receive more abuse on Twitter than women

Link here https://www.demos.co.uk/press-release/demos-male-celebrities-receive-more-abuse-on-twitter-than-women-2/

Not only that, this little gem also appears in the “study” cited by these feminist twats to support their boo hoo.

“The study included celebrities, politicians, journalists and musicians – specifically chosen to ensure an equal number – roughly one million – were aimed at each gender.

It found:

– 2.54% of the tweets containing the @ username of male public figures contained abuse, compared to only 0.95% of the tweets received by prominent women.

Over 1 in 20 (5.19%) of the tweets sent to male celebrities included abuse, compared with 1 in 70 (1.37%) aimed at female celebrities.

– Journalism is the only category where women received more abuse than men, with female journalists and TV news presenters receiving roughly three times as much abuse as their male counterparts.

– Men were much more likely to troll public figures via social media. Three-quarters of the abuse received by prominent men, and over 60% of abuse received by women, was tweeted by men.

– Piers Morgan, Ricky Gervais and Katie Hopkins were three of the most likely celebrities to receive abuse.”

Hmmmmm, are you seeing what I’m seeing?

Ok – lets just see exactly what the feminist crybabies Jenny and Sinead (pronounced Shin – ayd) said about twitter:

“The non-profit group Working to Halt Online Abuse found that from 2000 to 2013, 70% of the 4,043 people who reported cyber harassment were female, while 25% were male and 5% were unknown.  British think tank Demos found in a 2014 study that on Twitter female journalists and TV presenters received roughly three times as much abuse as their male counterparts”

And then remind ourselves of what the study ACTUALLY reported – shall we?

“– 2.54% of the tweets containing the @ username of male public figures contained abuse, compared to only 0.95% of the tweets received by prominent women.

Over 1 in 20 (5.19%) of the tweets sent to male celebrities included abuse, compared with 1 in 70 (1.37%) aimed at female celebrities.”

No doubt you can see that Jennifer Adams and Sinead Carolan of Office of the OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media published a statement that is the EXACT OPPOSITE of the statement in the “Study” they cited to support the absolute bare-faced lie they told.

No doubt many of you are familiar with the feminist propensity for taking data out of context, with conflating, twisting and misrepresenting “facts” in order to support whatever tedious, ridiculous, insane “theory” they wish to shove into your face.

But this! This is so blatant, so ridiculous, so in your face that it did actually make me LOL.

Now, why am I not addressing the content of Jenny and Sinead’s little screed?

Simples – it’s the usual feminist shoite.

For example:

“Attacks like these are both gendered and life-altering events. This is why we talk about online violence and the safety of women online, rather than the issue of their polite treatment. In fact, the chilling effect that online violence and cyber-misogyny has on female voices is a direct challenge to democracy.”

Ah, right the attacks!

The attacks that happen AGAINST males at three times the rate of these so-called attacks on females – those “attacks?”

Personally, I have received some very very bizarre comments – from some very very disturbed people – ALL feminists – as they usually gleefully inform me – before they threaten me personally, sigh.

I have a folder with the choicest ones saved – for posterity…..and my personal amusement 😉

The only part of the above statement that has even a grain of truth in it is the “gendered………” part – yep the nastiest comments ALL emanate from FEMALES – feminist FEMALES.

What about the LIFE-ALTERING EVENTS thingamajig?


“Life-altering events” my arse – unless of course you happen to be female and NOT A FEMINIST.

This delightful quote:

“These stories are, tragically, not the exception – online violence continues to raise the stakes for women speaking, blogging, writing and reporting in the public sphere every day. We run a project at the Office of the OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media called #SOFJO, short for ‘Safety of Female Journalists Online’. We focus on the issues of equal representation and media pluralism by looking at the gendered component of online violence and the way it silences female voices and female stories in the media.”

Is without exception an illustration par excellence of feminist double speak – without any irony whatsoever these two dimwits peddle the “silences female voices and female stories…” crap.

The reason why I decided to address this pathetic little article is because I was doing a quick update on what various global bodies were up to with regard to “gender” issues. The OECD, the UN, the EU, the WHO – etc. – as in – popping onto their various sites and perusing the latest “gender” shoite.


I won’t bore you with the latest crap emanating from these organisations – but one did catch my eye.

New women leaders institute to be chaired by former Oz PM, By Liz Heron on 20/04/2018

Link here https://www.globalgovernmentforum.com/new-women-leaders-institute-to-be-chaired-by-former-oz-pm/

The former Australian prime minister has been appointed to the chair of the Global Institute for Women’s Leadership, soooooooooo I decided to have a little look see – and – it has a blog

Global Institute for Women’s Leadership – Blog

Link here https://www.kcl.ac.uk/giwl/blog.aspx?page=1

First article on the blog is this: Violence against women online is a direct challenge to pluralism and democracy – and here we are.

If I was to speculate – I would posit that the level and intensity of anti-feminist and non -feminist content on the internet – blogs, twitter etc. has increased significantly since the election of Donald Trump – and no, I have no opinion re President Trump – it is palpable – as is the level of public support for non-feminist ideas, opinions and commentary – and this more than anything is what is very scary for feminists – especially feminist media.

Shutting down debate, shutting down commentators who say and publish things that are in direct conflict with feminist ‘ideology’ or ‘perspectives’ has now reached ludicrous heights – but the words, horse and barn spring to mind.

People are sick to death of feminist crap, sick to death of the perpetual whining of feminists, sick to death of the never-ending parade of “victims” I know I am.

This is what scares feminists – not being able to control the flow of information, not being in charge of the discourse – hence the manufacturing of ever more ridiculous, and ever more hysterical claims like the title of this article “Violence against women online is a direct challenge to pluralism and democracy

Pluuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuueeeze – grow up and stop being such a pair of pathetic crybabies!








Get Off the Internet: Real Life is………..OUT THERE >>>>>>>>


And yes, I mean this obscure little blog as well!

Over the course of my life I have learnt several things – and the most important thing of all is that PEOPLE matter – flesh and blood people – not bells and whistles – not how snazzy or high tech your toys are, or as Mama would say how high-falutin your plamais (bullshit) is  – and in her less kind moments –how you are nothing but one of  the “fur coat and no knickers brigade”.

Basically you can wrap a turd up in pretty paper and ribbons – organise a marching band and a travelling midget circus to accompany its presentation – but – it is still a turd – wrapped in pretty paper and ribbons.

I recently became aware of a series of videos, which consists of various females holding up hand written signs proclaiming why they “don’t need feminism”

Really? Is that so? So fucking what? The Men’s Human Rights Movement is NOT – I repeat not supposed to be about what YOU need – or about YOU – and by you, I mean over privileged, pampered young women who wouldn’t know injustice, pain, fear or real suffering if it jumped up and bit them on the backside.

There is also another “trend” that seems to be developing – within the MHRM itself – the message is getting lost in the medium – the message is now secondary to the snazziness of the medium through which it is being disseminated.

Yep – I hold my hand up – I am a tech moron – totally – I could care less about twitter shit – facebook frolics or any other mindless activity – and to my mind – I could be wrong – most of it IS mindless that happens – on the internet. Not all – just most of it.

But it has become a God – the technology has replaced religion – as the Deity De Jour of human interactions – or rather has become a contest between competing parties for the title of tech king or queen of the MHRM.

All this bollox – all this “I’m putting in or I’ve got the latest super duper hi tech this and that” on my blog or site or facebook page or whatever– crap – in what way does this progress or advance the cause of Men’s Human Rights? – in what way does this change one single law – repeal one single policy – help one single man or boy – sitting alone in a room – with everything stripped from him – including his dignity and worth as a human being?

In what way does this improve the message?


I don’t give a flying rats arse about video’s, about twitter, about facebook or about having the latest high tech gizmo – I care that no-one cares about that man or boy – that no-one gives a shit if he lives or dies – I CARE – and I would trample all your hi tech crap into the ground if I thought for one minute that doing so would save that man or boys life.

And if you really give a shit – then all you who are having your hi tech pissing contests would do the same.

Jesus Christos – GET OFF YOUR BLOODY ARSES – get off the bloody internet – go talk to real people – put REAL people in your poxy video’s – put real boys and men’s voices on the fucking internet – shut the fuck up – with your smart alec diatribes, your clever little vignettes – yeah yeah yeah – we already know you’re as smart as a whip, and a clever clogs – how many bloody videos and articles does it take for you to say or show that? 10? 20? A 100?

How many snotty smug little twats prancing about in their bedrooms holding up signs and breathlessly exclaiming why they “don’t need feminism” does it take before you realise this?

So fucking what? Who gives a shit?

Sell your bloody webcam and donate the money to a homeless shelter for men and boys – use the money you spent on the new clothes and other crap you bought so you could “look your best” for your 15 minutes of fame on the bloody internet to ANY fathers rights organisation.

You want a round of applause for being a twat? For simpering and smirking your way through 15 mins of internet fame? Bite me!

That homeless man you stepped over on your way to buy your crap surely appreciates the “effort” you made to make HIS life absolutely no better by your actions.

The father who reeled out of the courthouse you passed by on your back with your shiny new webcam is overcome with gratitude that you “don’t need feminism

This is NOT about you – or what you feel – or what you think, or what you want the world to know about YOU.

THIS IS ABOUT WHAT ARE you going to do about THAT homeless man – THAT devastated father – TODAY?

Like I said – a tech moron – and you know what – I make absolutely no apology for that – so what if I don’t “make videos” that are such, like, high tech super cool, with super fabulous production values? So what if I don’t have all the latest bells and whistles and gizmos that apparently one simply cannot communicate with other human beings without?

I’m communicating now – all anyone needs to do to read what I’m communicating is to type anjaeriud or mensrightsarehumanrights or as recently someone did “mgtow selfish” to get here.

Is what I’m saying any less clear, any less unequivocal because I know fuck all about embedding videos or “media” into this post?

Is it?

Does any man or boy suffering right now as I type this on my shitty laptop, with my crappy broadband connection give one single flying fuck whether or not I “put a video up” on “the internet” with me holding a handwritten sign saying “I don’t need feminism because………..blah, blah blah”

No! He bloody doesn’t – and why the hell should he?

The message of thee of Men’s Human Rights Movement is simple:


If you can read that – that’s all you need to know – NOW – what are you going to do in real life that makes that message the one that informs laws, public policy, changes  hearts and minds – makes the life of one single man or boy a little less shit – TODAY?

You could start by going to your local church hall or community centre and start a men’s  support group – imagine that – a place for men to go to meet other human beings,  a cup of tea and a chat and be acknowledged AS a human being!

Doesn’t even have to be about men’s rights – talk about football, vegtable growing, just TALK – interact – as human beings. I don’t know, call it ManChat – call it whatever you like – just do it!

And by the way ladies, if one of you decides to do this – make the tea, make the sandwiches then piss off – leave them alone – resist the urge to “manage” these guys – fight the inclination to “organise” these guys – just piss off and leave them alone – ok?

Who are you going to vote for? Which MENS charities are you going to support, donate to?  Are you going say stop the next time you hear some whiny rancid trollop gloating about how she “took him to the cleaners” in court?

Who are you going to Vote for?

Well here’s a suggestion as who to vote for if you live in the UK – Mike Buchanan – Party leader of J4MB – Justice for Men and Boys (and the women who love them) and as many of their candidates as they run in the 2015 General Election.


Read this: http://j4mb.wordpress.com/our-public-consultation-exercise-2/

Support this: http://j4mb.wordpress.com/national-conference-on-fathers-rights/

“National conference on father’s rights – London, November 2014

We’re planning to be the first British political party to host a national conference on fathers’ rights. It’s expected that it will be held in November, in central London, and we’ll have more to say in due course. Of course it’s not only fathers whose human rights are assaulted by legislation and the family courts system. So too are the rights of children, grandparents, and a small number of mothers. The conference will cover their rights too.”


Don’t just sneak into the ballot box with your head down hoping see’s you – walk in with your head held high – and for the love of God – tell your friends, your family, your co-workers, the lady you chatted to at the bus stop to do the same.


Are you going to step up and say – THIS IS WRONG – TODAY – in real life – to whoever will listen

© Anja Eriud 2014